<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SCIPOLICY JOURNAL - PRWeb Press Release Account Feed</title>
<link>http://www.rsspad.com/rss2a/86180.xml</link>
<description>SCIPOLICY JOURNAL - Press Releases</description>
<language>en</language>
<managingEditor>xml@emediawire.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>xml@emediawire.com</webMaster>
<ttl>30</ttl>
<item>
     <title>Heavy Demand for Intelligent Design and Science Wars Articles Prompts SciPolicy Journal to Give Free and Open Access to Archives </title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb312377.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P>SciPolicy -- The Journal of Science and Health Policy -- announced today that, as a public service, all of its articles are now free and open access on-line. The move is prompted by a recent ten-fold increase in demands on its already busy website (http://scipolicy.net) for articles related to its Amicus Currie filing in Federal Court (Kitzmiller, et al v Dover Area School District and school Board) opposing government mandates to teach of intelligent design in public schools and the Science Wars controversies. (PRWeb Nov 21, 2005)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb312377.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb312377.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb312377.htm</guid>
        </item>
<item>
     <title>SciPolicy Journal files Amicus Curie Brief in Intelligent Design Case </title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb307701.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P>Editorial opposes government encroaching on science methods (PRWeb Nov 8, 2005)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb307701.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb307701.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb307701.htm</guid>
        </item>
<item>
     <title>Undecided Voter Form: An Interesting Way to Assess Information About the Candidates for President</title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/10/prweb171564.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P>Provided as a public service, strictly Non-Partisan (PRWeb Oct 26, 2004)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/10/prweb171564.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/10/prweb171564.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/10/prweb171564.htm</guid>
        </item>
<item>
     <title>"THE PAYOFF"- Accountability of Scientific Organizations and Evaluation of Research Centers and Institutes Highlighted in New Book</title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/10/prweb169003.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P> (PRWeb Oct 20, 2004)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/10/prweb169003.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/10/prweb169003.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/10/prweb169003.htm</guid>
        </item>
<item>
     <title>SEARCH FOR THE PAYOFF of RESEARCH CENTERS, INSTITUTES, AND CONSORTIA - IN MEDICAL, BASIC, AND APPLIED SCIENCE </title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/08/prweb145583.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P> (PRWeb Aug 2, 2004)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/08/prweb145583.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/08/prweb145583.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/08/prweb145583.htm</guid>
        </item>
<item>
     <title>Global Restructuring of University andIndustry Research Centers, Institutes, and Consortia - Managed Science and Mandatory Evaluation Conflict With Scientific Freedom  </title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/07/prweb142927.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P>A wave of managed scientific research in regional, national, and global scale is restructuring the organization and funding of scholarly and medical research centers at universities, institutes, laboratories, and consortia. It includes mandated evaluation of research centers, performance measures of their degrees of successes and outcomes in the communities served, measures of the degrees of benefits bestowed upon all the stakeholders - including the host universities and funding sources. "THE PAYOFF - Evaluating Research Centers, Institutes, Laboratories, and Consortia For Success"  by William R. Tash of Temple University and Stephen Miles Sacks of SciPolicy Publications (http://scipolicy.net) highlights the issues and includes a comprehensive guide for research directors, administrators, and funding officials to evaluate their research centers for success.   (PRWeb Jul 26, 2004)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/07/prweb142927.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/07/prweb142927.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/07/prweb142927.htm</guid>
        </item>
<item>
     <title>System of Scientific Peer Review in Effect Since Galileo Scuttled By the Bush Administration - Consequences Not Commonly Understood - OBM Seeking to Dispel Fears of Bias </title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/03/prweb108272.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P>President George Bush's Office of Budget and Management (OMB) is requiring peer review of all significant scientific regulatory information conveyed to the public. They are taking over a previously voluntary method that has served science and humanity well since Galileo' time (1615). The move gives the White House excessive span of control without adequate checks and balances. It opens the door to abuse and misuse of the peer review process - to advance political or normative agendas by the executive branch, scientific groups themselves, or other interest groups. (PRWeb Mar 2, 2004)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/03/prweb108272.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/03/prweb108272.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/03/prweb108272.htm</guid>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>