<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>STEPHENSON GROUP - PRWeb Press Release Account Feed</title>
<link>http://www.rsspad.com/rss2a/89279.xml</link>
<description>STEPHENSON GROUP - Press Releases</description>
<language>en</language>
<managingEditor>xml@emediawire.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>xml@emediawire.com</webMaster>
<ttl>30</ttl>
<item>
     <title>Petition Filed with FDA to Require Eye Care Professionals to Warn Parents that Distance Lenses Worsen Myopia</title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/05/prweb235073.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P>The International Myopia Prevention Association (IMPA) has filed a Petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) seeking enforcement action to require eye care professionals to advise parents of children with initial myopia that distance (minus) lenses worsen myopia and that myopia may be prevented by using reading (plus) lenses for computer usage and other prolonged close work. (PRWeb May 1, 2005)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/05/prweb235073.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/05/prweb235073.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/05/prweb235073.htm</guid>
        </item>
<item>
     <title>Survey Shows Pay-For-Placement PR Model is Expanding Number of Companies Outsourcing PR Services</title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/04/prweb226382.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P>According to a recent survey, the public relations &#8220;pay-for-placement&#8221; business model seems to be expanding the pool of PR agency clients, rather than taking significant numbers of clients away from existing agencies. By far, the highest rated reason respondents chose a pay-for-placement model was the ability to pay for results vs. an agency&#8217;s time (51.6% of respondents), followed by the ability to decline a media opportunity without payment (19.4%) and no minimum retainer (8.1%). Other reasons included the ability to specialize by media type, measurement is clearer, their priority is media relations and they don&#8217;t want to pay for other services, no time commitment required, and agency takes on the risk. (PRWeb Apr 12, 2005)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/04/prweb226382.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/04/prweb226382.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/04/prweb226382.htm</guid>
        </item>
<item>
     <title>New PayPerClip(sm) PR Model Signs 32 Clients in First Six Months - Risk-Free Plus(tm) Guarantee and Pay-for-Placement Billing Model Draw Strong Response</title>
     <link>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/02/prweb212088.htm</link><description>   <![CDATA[ <P>Pay-for-Placement public relations takes off. New PR agency signs 32 clients in six months. (PRWeb Feb 25, 2005)</P>
                                <P>Read the full story at <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/02/prweb212088.htm">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/02/prweb212088.htm</a></P>]]>
                </description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/02/prweb212088.htm</guid>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>